4.5 Article

Lactobacillus crispatus modulates epithelial cell defense against Candida albicans through Toll-like receptors 2 and 4, interleukin 8 and human β-defensins 2 and 3

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY LETTERS
卷 156, 期 1-2, 页码 102-109

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2013.08.013

关键词

Lactobacillus crispatus; Candida albicans; Toll-like receptors; Defensins

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lactobacilli are members of the normal mucosal microflora of most animals. Probiotic bacteria, such as Lactobacilli, play a major role in the maintenance of a healthy urogenital tract by preventing the colonization of pathogenic bacteria. The potentially probiotic strain Lactobacillus crispatus (ATCC 33820) was investigated for its capacity to influence the innate immune response of HeLa epithelial cells to Candida albicans. In addition, its capacity to modulate the toll-like receptor (TLR) expression of HeLa cells was investigated by Western blot. When HeLa cells were pre-treated with the L crispatus and infected with C albicans, the interleukin-8 levels were significantly lower than without pre-treatment. Also, the effect of L crispatus on innate immunity was enhanced by its capacity to increase the effect of human beta-defensin 3 against C. albicans growth. Pre-treating HeLa cells with L crispatus attenuated the yeast's virulence, as demonstrated by its reduced adhesion and growth on human epithelial cells. Our findings indicated, also, that after contact with C albicans, epithelial cells expressed more TLR2/4 than non-infected cells, whereas pre-treatment with L crispatus downregulated the TLFt2/4 expression by epithelial cells stimulated with C albicans. In conclusion, our results show that L. crispatus promotes epithelial cell defense against C. albicans infection through the involvement of TLR2/4, IL-8 and human beta-defensin 2 and 3, thus suggesting a probiotic potential of this Lactobacillus as an anti-infective agent against C. albicans. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据