4.5 Article

Successfully treated HIV-infected patients have differential expression of NK cell receptors (NKp46 and NKp30) according to AIDS status at presentation

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY LETTERS
卷 152, 期 1, 页码 16-24

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2013.03.003

关键词

HIV; NKp46; NKp30; Opportunistic infection; AIDS

资金

  1. Istituto Superiore di Sanita (I.S.S.)
  2. Programma nazionale di ricerca sull' AIDS, Accordi di collaborazione scientifica [40G.41, 45G.11]
  3. Accordo di collaborazione scientifica [40D61, 40H69]
  4. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (A.I.R.C.)
  5. Ministero della Salute [RF2006]
  6. Ricerca Oncologica-Project of Integrated Program [3/07, RF-2010-2316197]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Differences in innate immune responses may be associated with different capabilities of controlling HIV infection, not necessarily reflected by CD4(+) T-cell counts alone. We investigated by cytofluorometry the expression of NK cell receptors and ligands in 19 treated HIV-infected patients with CD4(+) <220 ml(-1) at presentation (11 AIDS, 8 non-AIDS) and 10 healthy donors. Expression of NKp46 and NKp30 was significantly higher in non-AIDS vs. AIDS patients. Overall, the level of NKp46 expression directly correlated with the degree of MR cell cytotoxicity. As compared to healthy donors, in both groups, there was a similar increase of CD69 and HLA-DR expression in NK cells that directly correlated with the presence of activation markers (HLA-DR) on CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. As compared to AIDS, in non-AIDS patients in vitro activated CD4(+) showed higher expression of MIC-A (NKG2D ligand), with significantly higher Nectin-2/DNAM-1 and MIC-A/NKG2D ratios. Thus, NK cell responses in AIDS and non-AIDS patients with similar CD4(+) counts significantly differ despite similar treatment. This suggests an involvement of innate mechanisms, in preventing AIDS-defining opportunistic infections in HIV infection and further suggests, that CD4(+) absolute counts alone, may be inadequate to explain differences in the clinical outcome. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据