4.5 Article

Selective elimination of pathogenic synovial fluid T-cells from Rheumatoid Arthritis and Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis by targeted activation of Fas-apoptotic signaling

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY LETTERS
卷 138, 期 2, 页码 161-168

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2011.04.004

关键词

Fas; FasL; Apoptosis; T-cells; Antibody fragment; CD7

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) elimination of autoreactive T-cells by FasL/Fas-mediated Activation-Induced Cell Death (AICD) appears to be inhibited resulting in the perpetuation of the inflammatory response and concomitant progressive tissue destruction. Here, we report on a novel strategy that aims to overcome the local inhibition of AICD by using rationally designed recombinant fusion proteins in which sFasL is genetically fused to a T-cell selective targeting domain. The series included sFasL fusion proteins with engineered binding specificity for various T-cell surface-expressed proteins including CD7, CD28, RANKL and CD40L. The proposed mode of action is that selective binding of a given sFasL fusion protein results in its accretion at the cell surface of T-cells only, displaying a surplus of sFasL that is available to reactivate AICD in pathogenic synovial T-cells. Of the series of T-cell targeting FasL fusion proteins a CD7-targeted fusion protein, designated scFvCD7:sFasL, proved to be the most potent, with significant pro-apoptotic activity towards synovial fluid T-cells in all patient samples tested (RA; n = 22: JIA; n = 6). Treatment with scFvCD7:sFasL induced up to 80% apoptosis in CD3-positive synovial T-cells. Importantly, scFvCD7:sFasL potently activated Fas-signaling in synovial T-H1 -cells as well as synovial T-reg cells, but not in synovial T-H2 cells. These findings indicate that scFvCD7:sFasL may be of therapeutic value for the selective elimination of pathogenic synovial T-cells of the T-H1 subtype in both RA and JIA. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据