4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Towards a comprehensive human cell-surface immunome database

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY LETTERS
卷 134, 期 2, 页码 183-187

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2010.09.016

关键词

Cell-surface proteins; Immune cells; Lymphoid tissues; Immunome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human immune system is a complex machinery involving numerous proteins. Proteins located at the cell surface of immune cells are of particular relevance due not only to their participation in the network of interactions that regulate the immune response but also to their potential as excellent targets for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. The main objective of this project is to generate a comprehensive database of the human cell-surface proteins expressed in immune cells and lymphoid tissues. For this purpose, we have integrated information collected from primary literature, databases and electronic information sources. This manually curated database includes the gene symbol and name of the protein, describes the family that each protein belongs to, indicates their type of extracellular domains, and compiles data regarding their expression. Thus far we have identified and catalogued 1015 genes and proteins. The largest families in this compendium are the Ig superfamily with 195 members (similar to 20%) and the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily with 147 members (similar to 14%). Other abundant families include the C-type lectin and the cytokine receptor families with 43 and 42 members respectively (4%). About 25% of the proteins belong to minor families and approximately 4% lack any clear family assignment. More than 60% of the genes encode proteins without a CD number. This database will serve to boost the production of new monoclonal antibodies and to stimulate studies aimed at characterizing the function of these proteins in the immune system as well as identifying potential new biomarkers and therapeutic targets. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据