4.5 Review

Mucosal macrophages and the regulation of immune responses in the intestine

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY LETTERS
卷 119, 期 1-2, 页码 22-31

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2008.05.009

关键词

intestine; macrophage; Toll-like receptor; immunoregulation

资金

  1. Medical Research Council Funding Source: Medline
  2. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The healthy intestinal mucosa is home to one of the largest populations of macrophages (m phi) in the body [Lee SH, Starkey PM, Gordon S. Quantitative analysis of total macrophage content in adult mouse tissues. Immunochemical studies with monoclonal antibody F4/80.J Exp Med 1985;161:475-89], yet little is known about their function. Resident m phi in the large and small intestine are distinct from other m phi populations in the body, with regards to both their functional properties and surface phenotype. They respond in an unconventional manner to inflammatory stimuli, with little upregulation of proteins involved in antigen presentation and T cell co-stimulation, and no production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This suggests that under resting conditions, intestinal m phi may be conditioned to be anti-inflammatory in response to local stimuli such as commensal bacteria. In contrast, during inflammation, intestinal m phi exhibit increased bactericidal and inflammatory abilities, promote protective immunity and/or mediate pathology. Thus the status of this cell may be the key to understanding how the intestine maintains a balance between being able to generate protective immunity against pathogens, but still prevent pathological inflammation under normal conditions. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge of intestinal m phi biology, and highlight the different levels of immunoregulation which influence these cells, with particular focus on innate pathogen recognition receptor (PRR) function and responsiveness to microbial stimuli. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据