4.3 Review

Mendelian susceptibility to mycobacterial disease: 2014-2018 update

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY AND CELL BIOLOGY
卷 97, 期 4, 页码 360-367

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/imcb.12210

关键词

IFN-gamma; mycobacterium; next-generation sequencing; primary immunodeficiency

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [5R37AI095983]
  2. Rockefeller University
  3. St. Giles Foundation
  4. National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM)
  5. Paris Descartes University
  6. Integrative Biology of Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratory of Excellence [ANR-10-LABX-62-IBEID]
  7. French National Research Agency under the Investments for the future program [ANR-10-IAHU-01]
  8. ANR-GENMSMD [ANR-16-CE17-0005-01]
  9. Jerome Lejeune Foundation
  10. Stony Wold-Herbert Fund
  11. Choh-Hao Li Memorial Fund Scholar Award
  12. Shanghai Educational Development Foundation
  13. European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) Long-Term fellowship
  14. Conacyt [277639]
  15. Stony Wold Herbert Fund
  16. ANR-HGDIFD [ANR-14-CE15-006-01]
  17. [SRC2017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mendelian susceptibility to mycobacterial disease (MSMD) is caused by inborn errors of IFN-gamma immunity. Since 1996, disease-causing mutations have been found in 11 genes, which, through allelic heterogeneity, underlie 21 different genetic disorders. We briefly review here progress in the study of molecular, cellular and clinical aspects of MSMD since the last comprehensive review published in 2014. Highlights include the discoveries of (1) a new genetic etiology, autosomal recessive signal peptide peptidase-like 2 A deficiency, (2) TYK2-deficient patients with a clinical phenotype of MSMD, (3) an allelic form of partial recessive IFN-gamma R2 deficiency, and (4) two forms of syndromic MSMD: ROR gamma/ROR gamma T and JAK1 deficiencies. These recent findings illustrate how genetic and immunological studies of MSMD can shed a unique light onto the mechanisms of protective immunity to mycobacteria in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据