4.3 Review

Activating and inhibitory receptors of natural killer cells

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY AND CELL BIOLOGY
卷 89, 期 2, 页码 216-224

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/icb.2010.78

关键词

co-stimulatory receptors; immune response; immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif; missing self; stress ligands

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC)
  2. Cancer Council of Victoria
  3. Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
  4. Bob Parker Memorial Trust
  5. Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Foundation
  6. National Breast Cancer Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural killer (NK) cells are potent immune effector cells that can respond to infection and cancer, as well as allowing maternal adaptation to pregnancy. In response to malignant transformation or pathogenic invasion, NK cells can secrete cytokine and may be directly cytolytic, as well as exerting effects indirectly through other cells of the immune system. To recognize and respond to inflamed or infected tissues, NK cells express a variety of activating and inhibitory receptors including NKG2D, Ly49 or KIR, CD94-NKG2 heterodimers and natural cytotoxicity receptors, as well as co-stimulatory receptors. These receptors recognize cellular stress ligands as well as major histocompatibility complex class I and related molecules, which can lead to NK cell responses. Importantly, NK cells must remain tolerant of healthy tissue, and some of these receptors can also prevent activation of NK cells. In this review, we describe the expression of prominent NK cell receptors, as well as expression of their ligands and their role in immune responses. In addition, we describe the main signaling pathways used by NK cell receptors. Although we now appreciate that NK cell biology is more complicated than first thought, there are still facets of their biology that remain unclear. These will be highlighted and discussed in this review. Immunology and Cell Biology (2011) 89, 216-224; doi:10.1038/icb.2010.78; published online 22 June 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据