4.3 Article

TGF-β-regulated tyrosine phosphatases induce lymphocyte apoptosis in Leishmania donovani-infected hamsters

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY AND CELL BIOLOGY
卷 89, 期 3, 页码 466-474

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/icb.2010.108

关键词

leishmaniasis; hamster; lymphocyte; TGF-beta; phosphatase; apoptosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Visceral leishmaniasis, which is caused by Leishmania donovani, is one of the major health problems of the Indian subcontinent. Infected hosts have been reported to have impaired lymphoproliferation. However, the fate of anergic cells is still elusive. In the present investigation, L. donovani-infected hamsters were used to study the mechanism of lymphocyte cell death. Lymph node-derived lymphocytes were analysed for apoptotic death through mitochondrial abnormality, caspase activity and DNA degradation. The data demonstrate that the disease progression leads to a gradual impairment of lymphocyte proliferation in the presence of Concanavalin A. The fate of the anergic lymphocytes is intrinsic apoptosis, which is evident by the depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane potential, cytosolic release of cytochrome c, caspase activation and DNA fragmentation. Tumour growth factor (TGF)-beta, which is secreted by macrophages, was significantly upregulated in the lymph node compartment of kinfected hamsters. Adding a neutralizing TGF-beta antibody and a recombinant TGF-beta resulted in the downregulation and induction of lymphocyte apoptosis, respectively. Furthermore, it has been observed that TGF-beta triggers the apoptotic death of lymphocytes through the upregulation of tyrosine phosphatase activity and that the use of sodium orthovanadate (Na3VO4, a tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor) reduces the apoptotic frequency. Thus, this study clearly reports the novel involvement of tyrosine phosphatases in TGF-beta-induced lymphocyte apoptosis in Leishmania-infected hamsters. Immunology and Cell Biology (2011) 89, 466-474; doi: 10.1038/icb.2010.108; published online 21 September 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据