4.6 Article

Interleukin-10 and interferon-γ modulate surface expression of fractalkine-receptor (CX3CR1) via PI3K in monocytes

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY
卷 129, 期 4, 页码 600-609

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03181.x

关键词

chemokine receptors; cytokines; human macrophages; monocytes; innate immunity; signalling; signal transduction

资金

  1. Fundacion Alberto J. Roemmers
  2. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnologicas, (CONICET)
  3. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica, Argentina

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>The membrane-anchored form of the chemokine fractalkine (CX(3)CL1) has been identified as a novel adhesion molecule that interacts with its specific receptor (CX(3)CR1) expressed in monocytes, T cells and natural killer cells to induce adhesion. In addition, CX(3)CL1 can be cleaved from the cell membrane to induce chemotaxis of CX(3)CR1-expressing leucocytes. Recently, marked variations in CX(3)CR1 monocyte expression have been observed during several pathological conditions. Regulation of CX(3)CR1 in monocytes during basal or inflammatory/anti-inflammatory conditions is poorly understood. The aim of this study was therefore to examine CX(3)CR1 expression during monocyte maturation and the effect of soluble mediators on this process. We found that basal expression of CX(3)CR1 in fresh monocytes was reduced during culture, and that lipopolysacchairde accelerated this effect. In contrast, interleukin-10 and interferon-gamma treatment abrogated CX(3)CR1 down-modulation, through a phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase-dependent pathway. Most importantly, CX(3)CR1 membrane expression correlated with monocyte CX(3)CL1-dependent function. Taken together, our data demonstrate that CX(3)CR1 expression in monocytes can be modulated, and suggest that alterations in their environment are able to influence CX(3)CL1-dependent functions, such as chemotaxis and adhesion, leading to changes in the kinetics, composition and/or functional status of the leucocyte infiltrate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据