4.6 Article

Type I Streptococcus pneumoniae carbohydrate utilizes a nitric oxide and MHC II-dependent pathway for antigen presentation

期刊

IMMUNOLOGY
卷 127, 期 1, 页码 73-82

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.02924.x

关键词

antigen presentation; antigen processing; capsule; major histocompatibility complex; nitric oxide; polysaccharide; streptococcus

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease [AI039576, AI062707]
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [T32AI007061, R21AI039576, R01AI039576, K22AI062707] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH [DP2OD004225] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Some pathogenic bacteria form thick capsules that both block immune responses through inhibition of complement deposition and phagocytosis and stimulate a weak response resulting from a lack of T-cell involvement. Contrary to this model, capsular polysaccharides from 23 serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae have been successfully used in a multivalent vaccine in the absence of a carrier protein. Furthermore, type I pneumococcal polysaccharide (Sp1) has been shown to activate T cells in vivo and in vitro via an uncharacterized mechanism. In the present report, we demonstrate that Sp1 utilizes the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II pathway in antigen-presenting cells (APCs) for processing and presentation. APCs internalize and process Sp1 through a nitric oxide-dependent mechanism and, once inside the cell, it associates with MHC II proteins in an H-2M-dependent manner that leads to in vivo T-cell activation. These results establish that Sp1 activates T cells which can lead to abscess formation in mice through an H-2M-dependent polysaccharide antigen presentation pathway in APCs, potentially contributing to pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine efficacy through the recruitment of T-cell help.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据