4.2 Article

Differential Regulation of T and B lymphocytes by PD-1 and SOCS-1 signaling in Hepatitis C Virus-associated non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

期刊

IMMUNOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS
卷 40, 期 3, 页码 243-264

出版社

INFORMA HEALTHCARE
DOI: 10.3109/08820139.2010.534218

关键词

T cells; B cells; PD-1; SOCS-1; immune dysregulation; HCV; lymphoma

资金

  1. ETSU [07-002M]
  2. NIH NIAID [R15AI072750, 1R15A1084057-01]
  3. China Scholarship Council [CSC 2008655005]
  4. Guangzhou Municipal Health Bureau, China
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R15AI072750] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

HCV infection is associated with immune dysregulation and B cell Non-Hodgkins lymphoma (HCV-NHL). We have previously shown in vitro that HCV core protein differentially regulates T and B cell functions through two negative signaling pathways, programmed death-1 (PD-1) and suppressor of cytokine signaling-1 (SOCS-1). In this report, we performed a detailed immunologic analysis of T and B cell functions in the setting of HCV-NHL. We observed that T cells isolated from patients with HCV-NHL exhibited an exhausted phenotype including decreased expression of viral-specific and non-specific activation markers; whereas B cells exhibited an activated phenotype including over-expression of cell activation markers and immunoglobulins compared to healthy subjects. Individuals with HCV alone or NHL alone exhibited abnormal T and B cell phenotypes, but to a lesser extent compared to HCV-NHL. This differential activation of T and B lymphocytes was inversely associated with the expression of PD-1 and SOCS-1. Interestingly, blocking PD-1 during TCR activation inhibited SOCS-1 gene expression, suggesting that these regulatory pathways are linked in T cells. Importantly, blocking PD-1 also restored the impaired T cell functions observed in the setting of HCV-NHL. These results support a coordinated mechanism by which HCV might cause immune dysregulation that is associated to HCV-NHL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据