4.3 Article

Characterization and allelic polymorphisms of rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) IgG Fc receptor genes

期刊

IMMUNOGENETICS
卷 63, 期 6, 页码 351-362

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00251-011-0514-z

关键词

Fc receptor; Fc gamma R; CD16; CD32; CD64; Allele; Polymorphism; Rhesus macaque

资金

  1. NIH [R21 AI078855]
  2. GSU Office of Research
  3. Georgia Research Alliance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Macaque models are invaluable for AIDS research. Indeed, initial development of HIV-1 vaccines relies heavily on simian immunodeficiency virus-infected rhesus macaques. Neutralizing antibodies, a major component of anti-HIV protective responses, ultimately interact with Fc receptors on phagocytic and natural killer cells to eliminate the pathogen. Despite the major role that Fc receptors play in protective responses, there is very limited information available on these molecules in rhesus macaques. Therefore, in this study, rhesus macaque CD32 (Fc gamma RII) and CD64 (Fc gamma RI) homologues were genetically characterized. In addition, presence of CD16 (Fc gamma RIII), CD32, and CD64 allelic polymorphisms were determined in a group of nine animals. Results from this study show that the predicted structures of macaque CD32 and CD64 are highly similar to their human counterparts. Macaque and human CD32 and CD64 extracellular domains are 88-90% and 94-95% homologous, respectively. Although all cysteines are conserved between the two species, macaque CD32 exhibits two additional N-linked glycosylation sites, whereas CD64 lacks three of them when compared to humans. Five CD32, three CD64, and three CD16 distinct allelic sequences were indentified in the nine animals examined, indicating a relatively high level of polymorphism in macaque Fc gamma receptors. Together, these results validate rhesus macaques as models for vaccine development and antibody responses, while at the same time, underscoring the need to take into account the high degree of genetic heterogeneity present in this species when designing experimental protocols.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据