4.3 Article

Differential mRNA expression of the avian-specific toll-like receptor 15 between heterophils from Salmonella-susceptible and -resistant chickens

期刊

IMMUNOGENETICS
卷 61, 期 1, 页码 71-77

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00251-008-0340-0

关键词

Toll-like receptor; Chicken; Heterophil; Salmonella; mRNA expression; Innate immunity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) are essential for recognition of conserved molecular constituents found on infectious microbes. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are a critical component of the PRR repertoire and are coupled to downstream production of cytokines, chemokines, and antimicrobial peptides by TLR adaptor proteins. Our laboratory previously demonstrated a role for TLR function in the differential innate response of two lines of chickens to bacterial infections. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the role of TLRs in the differential innate responsiveness by measuring differences between lines A (resistant) and B (susceptible) in heterophil mRNA expression of selected TLRs (TLRs 4, 5, and 15) and TLR adaptor proteins (MyD88, TRIF, and TIRAP) in response to stimulation with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (SE). Although heterophils from both lines had significantly increased expression of TLR 15 mRNA in response to stimulation with SE, heterophils from chickens resistant to infection with SE had significantly greater levels of TLR 15 mRNA expression prior to and following stimulation with SE than heterophils from chickens susceptible to infection with SE. No significant differences were noted between lines in nonstimulated levels of TIRAP, but upon SE stimulation, line A birds had higher levels of expression than B birds. No significant differences were found in heterophils between lines for mRNA expression of TLRs 4 and 5 nor MyD88 and TRIF. These data indicate that differences in the gene expression of TLR 15 by heterophils likely accounts for some of the observed differences between the lines in their susceptibility to infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据