4.3 Review

The in vivo extracellular life of facultative intracellular bacterial parasites: Role in pathogenesis

期刊

IMMUNOBIOLOGY
卷 218, 期 3, 页码 325-337

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.imbio.2012.05.011

关键词

Facultative intracellular pathogens; Intracellular infection; Extracellular infection; Pathogenesis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Classically labeled facultative intracellular pathogens are characterized by the ability to have an intracellular phase in the host, which is required for pathogenicity, while capable of extracellular growth in vitro. The ability of these bacteria to replicate in cell-free conditions is usually assessed by culture in artificial bacteriological media. However, the extracellular growth ability of these pathogens may also be expressed by a phase of extracellular infection in the natural setting of the host with pathologic consequences, an ability that adds to the pathogenic potential of the infectious agent. This infective capability to grow in the extracellular sites of the host represents an additional virulence attribute of those pathogens which may lead to severe outcomes. Here we discuss examples of infectious diseases where the in vivo infective extracellular life is well documented, including infections by Francisella tularensis, Yersinia pestis, Burkholderia pseudomallei, Burkholderia cenocepacia, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and Edwardsiella tarda. The occurrence of a phase of systemic dissemination with extracellular multiplication during progressive infections by facultative intracellular bacterial pathogens has been underappreciated, with most studies exclusively centered on the intracellular phase of the infections. The investigation of the occurrence of a dual lifestyle in the host among bacterial pathogens in general should be extended and likely will reveal more cases of infectious diseases with a dual infective intracellular/extracellular pattern. (C) 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据