4.3 Article

The three complementarity-determining region-like loops in the second extracellular domain of human Fc alpha/mu receptor contribute to its binding of IgA and IgM

期刊

IMMUNOBIOLOGY
卷 218, 期 5, 页码 798-809

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.imbio.2012.09.004

关键词

Human Fc alpha/mu R; IgA; IgM; Binding sites; Complementarity-determining region

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30972717]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Fc alpha/mu receptor (Fc alpha/mu R, CD351) is a receptor that has dual specificity for IgA and IgM. Its second extracellular domain (EC2) has an Ig variable region-like structure and is predicted to be the ligand binding domain. EC2 is homologous to the first Ig-like domain (D1) of polymeric Ig receptor (plgR) and has three complementarity-determining region (CDR)-like loops. A peptide that includes the CDR1-like loop region has been found to be responsible for IgA and IgM binding. However, whether the CDR2and CDR3-like loops of EC2 contribute to ligand binding has remained unclear. In this work, we made three chimaeric receptors composed of the hFc alpha/mu R backbone but having the CDR1-, CDR2- and CDR3-like loops of EC2 replaced by their counterpart loops from human pIgR D2, which itself does not bind IgA or IgM. Flow cytometly and confocal microscopy analysis showed that substitution of either the CDR1or the CDR2-like loop abrogated IgA and IgM binding, indicating that both the CDR1- and the CDR2-like loops were important for ligand binding. In comparison, substitution of CDR3-like loop resulted in significant loss of IgM binding but has only a small negative effect on IgA binding. In addition, site-directed mutagenesis of the three CDR-like loops showed that residues Va129, Arg31, Asn54, G1n55, G1u98, Asn99 and Asn100 were involved in both IgA and IgM binding, and substitution of G1u98 within the CDR3-like loop increased IgA binding but decreased IgM binding. (C) 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据