4.3 Article

KAP1/TRIM28: An inhibitor of IRF5 function in inflammatory macrophages

期刊

IMMUNOBIOLOGY
卷 217, 期 12, 页码 1315-1324

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.imbio.2012.07.026

关键词

IRF5; KAP1; TRIM28; SETDB1; Tumour necrosis factor (TNF); Macrophage; Inflammation; H3K9me3

资金

  1. MRC [MR/J001899/1]
  2. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology
  3. MRC [MR/J001899/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [MR/J001899/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IRF5 plays a key role in the induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines, contributing to the plasticity and polarisation of macrophages to an M1 phenotype and initiation of a potent T(H)1-T(H)17 response. To better understand the means of IRF5 transcriptional action, we conducted a screen for IRF5-interacting partners by affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry and identified KAP1/TRIM28 as a novel protein-protein interaction partner of IRF5. KAP1 acts as a transcriptional co-repressor, chiefly via recruitment of complexes involved in chromatin silencing, such as histone deacetylases and methyltransferases. We mapped the N-terminus of IRF5, encompassing its DNA-binding domain together with a highly intrinsically disordered region, as crucial for the IRF5-KAP1 interaction interface, and demonstrated that IRF5 can also form complexes with the methyltransferase SETDB1. Knockdown of KAP1 (TRIM28) gene expression in human M1 macrophages potentiated IRF5-mediated expression of TNF and other M1 macrophage markers. This effect may be linked to methyltransferase activity of SETDB1, such as trimethylation of lysine 9 of histone 3 (H3K9me3), deposition of which was decreased at the human TNF locus upon KAP1 knockdown. Our study furthers an understanding of the complex molecular interactions between the TRIM and IRF protein families, and highlights a role of the inhibitory properties of KAP1 in association with IRF5-mediated gene expression. (C) 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据