4.8 Review

Necroptosis: The Release of Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns and Its Physiological Relevance

期刊

IMMUNITY
卷 38, 期 2, 页码 209-223

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.02.003

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen) [G.0728.10, 3G067512, 3G060713, 3G0A5413]
  2. FWO-Vlaanderen [31507110]
  3. Emmanuel van der Schueren scholarship from the Flemish league against cancer
  4. European grants (FP6 ApopTrain, FP7 EC RTD Integrated Project, Apo-Sys, Euregional PACT II) [MRTNCT-035624, FP7-200767]
  5. Belgian grants (Interuniversity Attraction Poles) [IAP 6/18, IAP 7/32]
  6. Flemish grants (Research Foundation Flanders) [FWO G.0875.11, FWO G.0973.11, FWO G.0A45.12N]
  7. Ghent University grants (MRP, GROUP-ID consortium)
  8. Flanders Institute for Biotechnology (VIB)
  9. Foundation against Cancer [F94]
  10. Methusalem grant from the Flemish Government [BOF09/01M00709]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regulated necrosis, termed necroptosis, is negatively regulated by caspase-8 and is dependent on the kinase activity of RIPK1 and RIPK3. Necroptosis leads to rapid plasma membrane permeabilization and to the release of cell contents and exposure of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). We are only beginning to identify the necroptotic DAMPs, their modifications, and their potential role in the regulation of inflammation. In this review, we discuss the physiological relevance of necroptosis and its role in the modulation of inflammation. For example, during viral infection, RIPK3-mediated necroptosis acts as a backup mechanism to clear pathogens. Necroptosis is also involved in apparently immunologically silent maintenance of T cell homeostasis. In contrast, the induction of necroptosis in skin, intestine, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and ischemia reperfusion injury provoke a strong inflammatory response, which might be triggered by emission of DAMPs from necroptotic cells, showing the detrimental side of necroptosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据