4.2 Article

Poroelastic materials reinforced by statistically oriented fibres-numerical implementation and application to articular cartilage

期刊

IMA JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS
卷 79, 期 5, 页码 1027-1059

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/imamat/hxu039

关键词

fibre-reinforced materials; permeability; Darcy's law; elasticity; poroelasticity; computational mechanics; Finite Element Method; articular cartilage; soft tissue; hydrated tissue; biomechanics

资金

  1. AITF (Alberta Innovates-Technology Futures) through the AITF New Faculty Programme
  2. NSERC (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada) through the NSERC Discovery Programme
  3. NSERC CREATE Programme at the University of Calgary
  4. Queen Elisabeth II Graduate Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work provides a method for the Finite Element implementation of a previously developed large deformation model for porous fibre-reinforced materials with statistically oriented fibres. The model, which includes a description of the elastic properties and the permeability, was implemented in the open source Finite Element package FEBio, and a number of different simulations were performed to verify the correctness and the robustness of the implementation. In a benchmark test, with statistical, anisotropic but homogenous fibre orientation, the simulations showed that the fluid flow along the dominant fibre direction is significantly larger than across the impermeable, reinforcing fibres, as suggested by previous experimental results and predicted by the theory. Furthermore, as an example of practical application, a realistic articular cartilage model, with statistical and depth-dependent fibre orientation was implemented, and an unconfined compression test was simulated. This could be regarded as the first full, realistic model of articular cartilage in which the effect of the statistically oriented collagen fibres was accounted for not only for the elastic properties, but also for the permeability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据