4.3 Article

Influence of Sex Differences and Gonadal Hormones on Cocaine Addiction

期刊

ILAR JOURNAL
卷 53, 期 1, 页码 14-22

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ilar.53.1.14

关键词

addiction; behavioral response; cocaine; female; hormone; reward; rodent model; sex difference; women

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) Research Centers in Minority Institutions [RCMI RR-03071]
  2. NIH Diversity-promoting Institutions Drug Abuse Research Program [DIDARP DA-12136]
  3. Professional Staff Congress of the City University of New York (PSC-CUNY)
  4. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [S03RR003071] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R24DA012136] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cocaine abuse is on the rise among women, and drug addiction studies consistently show greater responses among females than males in various cocaine-related outcomes. Animal and human studies reveal sexually dimorphic patterns in behavioral responses to cocaine in all phases of the cocaine addiction process from initiation to maintenance and relapse. Furthermore, in animal models, females require lower doses of cocaine to develop faster conditioned place preference and cocaine-induced psychomotor behaviors and sensitization. A clear picture is emerging and suggests that the biological basis of sex-specific differences in cocaine addiction lies, in part, in the disparate regulation of the central nervous system by male and female gonadal hormones and, in part, in chromosomal mechanisms that contribute to drug abuse vulnerability. The interactions of the many factors that affect sex differences appear to be complex. For example, in females, estradiol has facilitatory effects overall, whereas progesterone inhibits most cocaine responses. This review presents a discussion of sex differences and the role of gonadal hormones as the biological basis for the sexually dimorphic pattern in behavioral responses to cocaine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据