4.4 Article

Genetic-based design of a tetra-band high-efficiency radio-frequency energy harvesting system

期刊

IET MICROWAVES ANTENNAS & PROPAGATION
卷 7, 期 15, 页码 1254-1263

出版社

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/iet-map.2013.0056

关键词

genetic algorithms; microstrip antennas; rectennas; energy harvesting; Genetic-based design; tetra-band high-efficiency radio-frequency energy harvesting system; genetic algorithms; RF bands; multi-resonant annular-ring patch antennas; electromagnetic simulator; circuit-level non-linear simulation tool; Harmonic balance technique; rectenna system; RF stationary conditions; tetra-band rectenna; frequency bands

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we exploit genetic algorithms to design a rectenna required to harvest ambient radio-frequency (RF) energy from four different RF bands in critical (ultra-low power) conditions. For this purpose a set of multi-resonant annular-ring patch antennas are pixel-wise described inside an electromagnetic simulator to provide the population' of individuals among which the genetic tool is able to select the most adapted one with respect to the design specifications. The further use of circuit-level non-linear simulation tool, based on Harmonic balance technique, allows the rigorous multi-band design of the whole rectenna system in RF stationary conditions at several received power levels. The result is a novel compact, lightweight and highly efficient tetra-band rectenna, able to harvest RF energy from GSM 900, GSM 1800, UMTS and WiFi sources available in the ambient. At these frequency bands high radiation efficiency is desired as an essential prerequisite for optimally handling very low-power densities. Very good agreement with measurements of both the radiating and rectifying designs is demonstrated in real office scenarios. Finally the rectenna is connected to a power management unit and the resulting assembly is tested in terms of stored energy while harvesting from a mobile cell-phone call.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据