4.7 Article

Sliding-Mode Antisway Control of an Offshore Container Crane

期刊

IEEE-ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 201-209

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMECH.2010.2093907

关键词

Antisway control; mobile harbor; offshore container crane; ship motions; sliding-mode control

资金

  1. Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program [10036235]
  2. Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Korea
  3. World Class University through the National Research Foundation of Korea
  4. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Korea [R31-2008-000-20004-0]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [R31-2012-000-20004-0, 과C6B1811] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a sliding-mode control for an offshore container crane is discussed. The offshore container crane is used to load/unload containers between a huge container ship (called the mother ship) and a smaller ship (called the mobile harbor), on which the crane is installed. The purpose of the mobile harbor is to load/unload containers in the open sea and transport them to shallower water where they can be offloaded at existing conventional ports, thereby obviating the need for expansive and expensive new facilities. The load/unload control objective is to suppress the pendulum motion (i.e., sway) of the load in the presence of the wave-and wind-induced movements (heave, roll, and pitch) of the mobile harbor. A new mechanism for lateral sway control, therefore, is proposed as well. A sliding surface is designed in such a way that the longitudinal sway of the load is incorporated with the trolley dynamics. The asymptotic stability of the closed-loop system is guaranteed by a control law derived for the purpose. The proposed new mechanism can suppress lateral sway, which functionality is not possible with conventional cranes. Simulation results are provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据