4.5 Article

A Multi-Traffic Inter-Cell Interference Coordination Scheme in Dense Cellular Networks

期刊

IEEE-ACM TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORKING
卷 26, 期 5, 页码 2361-2375

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNET.2018.2866410

关键词

eICIC; 3GPP; ABSF; ICIC; scheduling; distributed algorithm; game theory

资金

  1. H2020 5G-MoNArch Project [761445]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [TEC2016-76795-C6-3-R]
  3. Ramon y Cajal Grant [RYC-2014-16285]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities [TIN2017-88749-R]
  5. Madrid Regional Government through the TIGRE5-CM Program [S2013/ICE-2919]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a novel semi-distributed and practical ICIC scheme based on the Almost Blank Sub-Frame (ABSF) approach specified by 3GPP. We define two mathematical programming problems for the cases of guaranteed and best-effort traffic, and use game theory to study the properties of the derived ICIC distributed schemes, which are compared in detail against unaffordable centralized schemes. Based on the analysis of the proposed models, we define Distributed Multi-traffic Scheduling (DMS), a unified distributed framework for adaptive interference-aware scheduling of base stations in future cellular networks, which accounts for both guaranteed and best-effort traffic. DMS follows a two-tier approach, consisting of local ABSF schedulers, which perform the resource distribution between the guaranteed and best effort traffic, and a light-weight local supervisor, which coordinates ABSF local decisions. As a result of such a two-tier design, DMS requires very light signaling to drive the local schedulers to globally efficient operating points. As shown by means of numerical results, DMS allows to: (i) maximize radio resources resue; (ii) provide requested quality for guaranteed traffic; (iii) minimize the time dedicated to guaranteed traffic to leave room for best-effort traffic; and (iv) maximize resource utilization efficiency for the best-effort traffic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据