4.7 Article

Disruption of Protein Complexes from Weighted Complex Networks

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2018.2859952

关键词

Proteins; Protein engineering; Complex networks; Biological processes; Organisms; Drugs; Weighed complex network; essential protein; betweenness; complex disruption

资金

  1. School of Biological Sciences, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM)
  2. Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medical College
  3. Islamic Azad University Qazvin Branch

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Essential proteins are indispensable units for living organisms. Removing those leads to disruption of protein complexes and causing lethality. Recently, theoretical methods have been presented to detect essential proteins in protein interaction network. In these methods, an essential protein is predicted as a high-degree vertex of protein interaction network. However, interaction data are usually incomplete and an essential protein cannot have high-connection due to data deficiency. Then, it is critical to design informative networks from other biological data sources. In this paper, we defined a minimal set of proteins to disrupt the maximum number of protein complexes. We constructed a weighted graph using a set of given complexes. We proposed a more appropriate method based on betweenness values to diagnose a minimal set of proteins whose removal would generate the disruption of protein complexes. The effectiveness of the proposed method was benchmarked using given dataset of complexes. The results of our method were compared to the results of other methods in terms of the number of disrupted complexes. Also, results indicated significant superiority of the minimal set of proteins in the massive disruption of complexes. Finally, we investigated the performance of our method for yeast and human datasets and analyzed biological properties of the selected proteins. Our algorithm and some example are freely available from http://bs.ipm.ac.ir/softwares/DPC/DPC.zip.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据