4.7 Article

Protein Function Prediction with Incomplete Annotations

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2013.142

关键词

Protein function prediction; multi-label learning; incomplete annotations

资金

  1. US NSF [IIS-0905117, IIS-1252318]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [61003174, 61101234, 61372138]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [XDJK2014C044, XDJK2013C026, XDJK2013C123]
  4. Doctoral Fund of Southwest University [SWU110063, SWU113034]
  5. China Scholarship Council (CSC)
  6. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  7. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1252318] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  9. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [0905117] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  11. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1205453] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Automated protein function prediction is one of the grand challenges in computational biology. Multi-label learning is widely used to predict functions of proteins. Most of multi-label learning methods make prediction for unlabeled proteins under the assumption that the labeled proteins are completely annotated, i.e., without any missing functions. However, in practice, we may have a subset of the ground-truth functions for a protein, and whether the protein has other functions is unknown. To predict protein functions with incomplete annotations, we propose a Protein Function Prediction method with Weak-label Learning (ProWL) and its variant ProWL-IF. Both ProWL and ProWL-IF can replenish the missing functions of proteins. In addition, ProWL-IF makes use of the knowledge that a protein cannot have certain functions, which can further boost the performance of protein function prediction. Our experimental results on protein-protein interaction networks and gene expression benchmarks validate the effectiveness of both ProWL and ProWL-IF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据