4.7 Article

Effect of microstructure on the very high cycle fatigue behavior of a bainite/martensite multiphase steel

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.02.015

关键词

Very high cycle fatigue; Bainite/martensite multiphase steel; Non-inclusion crack initiation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51271013]
  2. Central Iron and Steel Research Institute
  3. Center for Structural and Functional Materials Research and Innovation
  4. Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We describe here the effect of microstructure on the very high cycle fatigue (VHCF) behavior of a high-strength bainite/martensite (B/M) multiphase steel (0.2C-1.4Si-2.2Mn-0.8Cr) studied through ultrasonic fatigue test, where the different microstructures were obtained via control of heat treatment. The study clearly points to that the microstructure had a significant effect on the VHCF behavior of B/M steel. The endurance limit of the steel after oil-cooling was enhanced by 75 MPa because of change in the microstructure. Three types of failure modes were observed depending on the inclusion and microstructure, i.e., surface defect-induced failure, inclusion-induced failure, and non-inclusion induced failure, where the non-inclusion induced failure was influenced by microstructure. Large plastic deformation occurred within the bainite lath, leading to debonding from the adjacent martensite, and the crack initiated at grain boundaries between large bainite laths and martensite. There was a competition between inclusion-induced failure and non-inclusion induced failure modes, and the crack initiated at relatively weak sites that existed between the matrix and inclusions. The present study underscores a potential approach for improving VHCF properties of next generation of advanced high strength steels, where microstructure can be tuned to improve the VHCF performance. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据