4.7 Article

Energy Management Control of Microturbine-Powered Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles Using the Telemetry Equivalent Consumption Minimization Strategy

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
卷 60, 期 9, 页码 4238-4248

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2011.2172646

关键词

Energy management control; equivalent consumption minimization strategy (ECMS); gas turbine; plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs)

资金

  1. City University of Hong Kong [7002586, 7002715]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a novel approach to the solution of the energy management problem of a microturbine-powered plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV). A series hybrid midsize sedan, utilizing a microturbine and a chargeable Li-ion battery stack as its primary energy source and energy storage system, respectively, is modeled in this paper. The equivalent consumption minimization strategy (ECMS) is utilized to minimize the driving cost based on Pontryagin's minimum principle. To identify the equivalent factor (EF), a new concept called the energy ratio is defined, which is demonstrated to be closely related to the EF over all possible trips. By detecting the vehicle position with a telemetry system and measuring the battery state of charge (SOC), the EF is updated in real time and is used as an input for the computation of the ECMS. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed ECMS exhibits driving cost and diesel consumption equivalent to that determined from numerical dynamic programming. Significantly, the proposed approach reduces the driving cost from 7.7% to 21.6%, compared with a baseline control over both urban and highway cycles. In addition, through numerical simulations, the computational cost of the proposed strategy is demonstrated to be acceptable for industrial applications. Furthermore, because this strategy uses the feedback of the battery SOC, the control performance is insensitive to the control parameter errors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据