4.7 Article

Fast and Accurate Algorithms for Re-Weighted l1-Norm Minimization

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING
卷 61, 期 23, 页码 5905-5916

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2013.2279362

关键词

Sparse signal recovery; compressed sensing; homotopy; basis pursuit denoising; LASSO

资金

  1. ONR [N00014-11-1-0459]
  2. Packard Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To recover a sparse signal from an underdetermined system, we often solve a constrained l(1)-norm minimization problem. In many cases, the signal sparsity and recovery performance can be further improved by replacing the l(1) norm with a weighted l(1) norm. Without prior information about the signal's nonzero elements, the procedure for selecting weights is iterative in nature. Common approaches update the weights at every iteration using the solution of a weighted l(1) problem from the previous iteration. This paper presents two homotopy-based algorithms that efficiently solve reweighted l(1) problems. First, we present an algorithm that quickly updates the solution of a weighted l(1) problem as the weights change. Since the solution changes only slightly with small changes in weights, we develop a homotopy algorithm that replaces old weights with new ones in a small number of computationally inexpensive steps. Second, we propose an algorithm that solves a weighted l(1) problem by adaptively selecting weights while estimating the signal. This algorithm integrates the reweighting into every step along the homotopy path by changing the weights according to changes in the solution and its support, allowing us to achieve a high quality signal reconstruction by solving a single homotopy problem. We compare both algorithms' performance, in terms of reconstruction accuracy and computational complexity, against state-of-the-art solvers and show that our methods have smaller computational cost. We also show that the adaptive selection of the weights inside the homotopy often yields reconstructions of higher quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据