4.7 Article

Secure Communication in Multiantenna Cognitive Radio Networks With Imperfect Channel State Information

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 1683-1693

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2011.2105479

关键词

Cognitive radio; imperfect channel state information; multiple antennas; secrecy rate; spectrum sharing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we address the issue of optimal transmitter design to achieve physical layer security for a multiple-input single-output (MISO) cognitive radio network (CRN), in which a secondary user transmitter (SU-Tx) sends confidential information to a SU receiver (SU-Rx) on the same frequency band with a primary user (PU) in the presence of an eavesdropper receiver (ED-Rx). It is assumed that all the channel state information (CSI) of the secondary, primary and eavesdropper channels is not perfectly known at the SU-Tx. The optimal transmitter design, under the restriction of Gaussian signaling without preprocessing of information, involves a nonconvex semiinfinite optimization problem which maximizes the rate of the secondary link while avoiding harmful interference to the PU and keeping the eavesdropper totally ignorant of the messages sent regardless of the uncertainties in the CSI. We propose two approaches to solve this challenging optimization problem. The first one relates the original problem to a sequence of semiinfinite capacity-achieving transmitter design problems in an auxiliary CRN without any eavesdropper, which can then be solved through transformations and using convex semidefinite programs (SDPs). The second approach explores the hidden convexity of the problem and hence transforms it into a single SDP, which significantly reduces the computational complexity. Furthermore, a few heuristic beamforming solutions for the ease of implementation are also introduced. Finally, simulation results are presented to evaluate the performance of the proposed optimal and suboptimal solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据