4.4 Article

Adaptive Mahalanobis Distance and k-Nearest Neighbor Rule for Fault Detection in Semiconductor Manufacturing

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSM.2010.2065531

关键词

Adaptive Mahalanobis distance; k-nearest neighbor rule; multivariate control charts (MCCs); nonparametric approach; semiconductor manufacturing; statistical fault detection

资金

  1. STMicroelectronics
  2. Communaute du Pays d'Aix
  3. Conseil General des Bouches-du-Rhone
  4. Conseil Regional Provence Alpes Cote d'Azur, France

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, fault detection has become a crucial issue in semiconductor manufacturing. Indeed, it is necessary to constantly improve equipment productivity. Rapid detection of abnormal behavior is one of the primary objectives. Statistical methods such as control charts are the most widely used approaches for fault detection. Due to the number of variables and the possible correlations between them, these control charts need to be multivariate. Among them, the most popular is probably the Hotelling T(2) rule. However, this rule only makes sense when the variables are Gaussian, which is rarely true in practice. A possible alternative is to use nonparametric control charts, such as the k-nearest neighbor detection rule by He and Wang, in 2007, only constructed from the learning sample and without assumption on the variables distribution. This approach consists in evaluating the distance of an observation to its nearest neighbors in the learning sample constituted of observations under control. A fault is declared if this distance is too large. In this paper, a new adaptive Mahalanobis distance, which takes into account the local structure of dependence of the variables, is proposed. Simulation trials are performed to study the benefit of the new distance against the Euclidean distance. The method is applied on the photolithography step of the manufacture of an integrated circuit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据