4.7 Article

Determination of the Identifiable Parameters in Robot Calibration Based on the POE Formula

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 1066-1077

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TRO.2014.2319560

关键词

Calibration and identification; kinematics; lie bracket; product of exponentials (POE) formula

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51075259, 51121063]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [2013007311003]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2014CB046600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an analytical approach to determine and eliminate the redundant model parameters in serial-robot kinematic calibration based on the product of exponentials formula. According to the transformation principle of the Lie algebra se(3) between different frames, the connection between the joints' twist errors and the links' geometric ones is established. Identifiability analysis shows that the redundant errors are simply equivalent to the commutative elements of the robot's joint twists. Using the Lie bracket operation of se(3), a linear partitioning operator can be constructed to analytically separate the identifiable parameters from the system error vector. Then, error models satisfying the completeness, minimality, and model continuity requirements can be obtained for any serial robot with all combinations and configurations of revolute and prismatic joints. The conventional conclusion that the maximum number of independent parameters is 4r + 2p + 6 in a generic serial robot with r revolute and p prismatic joints is verified. Using the quotient manifold of the Lie group SE(3), the links' geometric errors and the joints' offset errors can be integrated as a whole, such that all these errors can be identified simultaneously. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, calibration simulations and experiments are conducted on an industrial six-degree-of-freedom (DoF) serial robot.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据