4.7 Article

Coupon Incentive-Based Demand Response: Theory and Case Study

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 1266-1276

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2218665

关键词

Coupon incentive-based demand response (CIDR); electricity markets; real-time price (RTP); smart grid communication

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1150944]
  2. Power Systems Engineering Research Center (PSERC)
  3. National High-Tech Research and Development Program of China (863 Scheme) [2011AA05A118]
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys [1150944] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents the formulation and critical assessment of a novel type of demand response (DR) program targeting retail customers (such as small/medium size commercial, industrial, and residential customers) who are equipped with smart meters yet still face a flat rate. Enabled by pervasive mobile communication capabilities and smart grid technologies, load serving entities (LSEs) could offer retail customers coupon incentives via near-real-time information networks to induce demand response for a future period of time in anticipation of intermittent generation ramping and/or price spikes. This scheme is referred to as coupon incentive-based demand response (CIDR). In contrast to the real-time pricing or peak load pricing DR programs, CIDR continues to offer a flat rate to retail customers and also provides them with voluntary incentives to induce demand response. Theoretical analysis shows the benefits of the proposed scheme in terms of social welfare, consumer surplus, LSE profit, the robustness of the retail electricity rate, and readiness for implementation. The pros and cons are discussed in comparison with existing DR programs. Numerical illustration is performed based on realistic supply and demand data obtained from the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据