4.3 Article

A Comparative Study of Water Electrodes Versus Metal Electrodes for Excitation of Nanosecond-Pulse Homogeneous Dielectric Barrier Discharge in Open Air

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE
卷 41, 期 10, 页码 3069-3078

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPS.2013.2279254

关键词

Dielectric barrier discharge (DBD); discharge emission; filamentary discharge; gas discharge; homogeneous discharge; metal electrode; nanosecond pulse; nonthermal plasma; open air; pulsed discharge; pulsed power; water electrode

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51222701, 51207154, 11076026]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2014CB239505]
  3. Opening Project of State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment at Xi'an Jiaotong University [EIPE12204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Atmospheric pressure low-temperature plasmas produced by dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) provide a promising approach for civilian application of pulsed power technology. In this paper, repetitive nanosecond pulses were generated using a magnetic compression solid-state pulsed power generator, and the rise time and pulse duration of the nanosecond pulse are similar to 30 and 70 ns, respectively. The DBD in open air is created using two kinds of electrodes, i.e., water and metal electrodes. The electrical, luminous, and optical characteristics of the DBDs under these two electrodes are studied and compared. The experimental results show that no filaments are observed and the discharge is homogeneous when water electrodes are used. The DBD still behaves in a filamentary mode when the discharge gap is extended to 4 cm in the case of metal electrodes. The results are validated by fast images taken by an intensified charge-coupled device camera. In addition, some discussion about the experimental results is presented. Improvement of discharge uniformity is due to the effect of resistive stabilization using water electrodes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据