4.8 Article

Fast Feature Pyramids for Object Detection

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2300479

关键词

Visual features; object detection; image pyramids; pedestrian detection; natural image statistics; real-time systems

资金

  1. MURI-ONR [N00014-10-1-0933, N00014-08-1-0638]
  2. ARO/JPL-NASA Stennis [NAS7.03001]
  3. NSERC [420456-2012]
  4. The Moore Foundation
  5. US National Science Foundation (NSF) [0448615]
  6. Google
  7. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  8. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [0448615] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multi-resolution image features may be approximated via extrapolation from nearby scales, rather than being computed explicitly. This fundamental insight allows us to design object detection algorithms that are as accurate, and considerably faster, than the state-of-the-art. The computational bottleneck of many modern detectors is the computation of features at every scale of a finely-sampled image pyramid. Our key insight is that one may compute finely sampled feature pyramids at a fraction of the cost, without sacrificing performance: for a broad family of features we find that features computed at octave-spaced scale intervals are sufficient to approximate features on a finely-sampled pyramid. Extrapolation is inexpensive as compared to direct feature computation. As a result, our approximation yields considerable speedups with negligible loss in detection accuracy. We modify three diverse visual recognition systems to use fast feature pyramids and show results on both pedestrian detection (measured on the Caltech, INRIA, TUD-Brussels and ETH data sets) and general object detection (measured on the PASCAL VOC). The approach is general and is widely applicable to vision algorithms requiring fine-grained multi-scale analysis. Our approximation is valid for images with broad spectra (most natural images) and fails for images with narrow band-pass spectra (e.g., periodic textures).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据