4.8 Article

Large-Margin Multi-View Information Bottleneck

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2013.2296528

关键词

Multi-view learning; large-margin learning; information bottleneck

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [FT130101457, DP140102164]
  2. NBRPC [2011CB302400]
  3. NSFC [61121002, 61375026]
  4. JCYJ [20120614152136201]
  5. Australian Research Council [FT130101457] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we extend the theory of the information bottleneck (IB) to learning from examples represented by multi-view features. We formulate the problem as one of encoding a communication system with multiple senders, each of which represents one view of the data. Based on the precise components filtered out from multiple information sources through a bottleneck, a margin maximization approach is then used to strengthen the discrimination of the encoder by improving the code distance within the frame of coding theory. The resulting algorithm therefore inherits all the merits of the IB principle and coding theory. It has two distinct advantages over existing algorithms, namely, that our method finds a tradeoff between the accuracy and complexity of the multi-view model, and that the encoded multi-view data retains sufficient discrimination for classification. We also derive the robustness and generalization error bound of the proposed algorithm, and reveal the specific properties of multi-view learning. First, the complementarity of multi-view features guarantees the robustness of the algorithm. Second, the consensus of multi-view features reduces the empirical Rademacher complexity of the objective function, enhances the accuracy of the solution, and improves the generalization error bound of the algorithm. The resulting objective function is solved efficiently using the alternating direction method. Experimental results on annotation, classification and recognition tasks demonstrate that the proposed algorithm is promising for practical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据