4.8 Article

Toward Open Set Recognition

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2012.256

关键词

Open set recognition; 1-vs-set machine; machine learning; object recognition; face verification; support vector machines

资金

  1. ONR MURI [N00014-08-1-0638]
  2. FAPESP [2010/05647-4]
  3. Army SBIR [W15P7T-12-C-A210]
  4. Microsoft
  5. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [10/05647-4] Funding Source: FAPESP
  6. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems
  7. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1320956] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To date, almost all experimental evaluations of machine learning-based recognition algorithms in computer vision have taken the form of closed setrecognition, whereby all testing classes are known at training time. A more realistic scenario for vision applications is open setrecognition, where incomplete knowledge of the world is present at training time, and unknown classes can be submitted to an algorithm during testing. This paper explores the nature of open set recognition and formalizes its definition as a constrained minimization problem. The open set recognition problem is not well addressed by existing algorithms because it requires strong generalization. As a step toward a solution, we introduce a novel 1-vs-set machine,which sculpts a decision space from the marginal distances of a 1-class or binary SVM with a linear kernel. This methodology applies to several different applications in computer vision where open set recognition is a challenging problem, including object recognition and face verification. We consider both in this work, with large scale cross-dataset experiments performed over the Caltech 256 and ImageNet sets, as well as face matching experiments performed over the Labeled Faces in the Wild set. The experiments highlight the effectiveness of machines adapted for open set evaluation compared to existing 1-class and binary SVMs for the same tasks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据