4.7 Article

Suspicious-Region Segmentation From Breast Thermogram Using DLPE-Based Level Set Method

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
卷 38, 期 2, 页码 572-584

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2018.2867620

关键词

SCH-CS; DLPE; suspicious region; thermal breast image; level set method

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India [BT/533/NE/TBP/2014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Segmentation of suspicious regions (SRs) of a thermal breast image (TBI) is a very significant and challenging problem for the identification of breast cancer. Therefore, in this work, we have proposed an active contour model for the segmentation of the SRs in TBI. The proposed segmentation method combines three significant steps. First, a novel method, called smaller-peaks corresponding to the high-intensity-pixels and the centroid-knowledge of SRs (SCH-CS), is proposed to approximately locate the SRs, whose contours are later used as the initial evolving curves of the level set method (LSM). Second, a new energy functional, called different local priorities embedded (DLPE), is proposed regarding the level set function. DLPE is then minimized using the interleaved level set evolution to segment the potential SRs in TBI more accurately. Finally, a new stopping criterion is incorporated into the proposed LSM. The proposed LSM not only increases the segmentation speed but also ameliorates the segmentation accuracy. The performance of our SR segmentation method was evaluated on two TBI databases, namely, DMR-IR and DBT-TU-JU, and the average segmentation accuracies obtained on these databases are 72.18% and 71.26% respectively, which are better than the other state-of-the-art methods. Beside this, a novel framework to analyze TBIs is proposed for differentiating abnormal and normal breasts on the basis of the segmented SRs. We have also shown experimentally that investigating only the SRs instead of the whole breast is more effective in differentiating abnormal and normal breasts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据