4.7 Article

Lung Segmentation in Chest Radiographs Using Anatomical Atlases With Nonrigid Registration

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
卷 33, 期 2, 页码 577-590

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2013.2290491

关键词

Chest X-ray imaging; computer-aided detection; image registration; image segmentation; tuberculosis (TB)

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  2. National Library of Medicine (NLM)
  3. Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications (LHNCBC)
  4. U.S. NIH National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) [R33-EB00573]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The National Library of Medicine (NLM) is developing a digital chest X-ray (CXR) screening system for deployment in resource constrained communities and developing countries worldwide with a focus on early detection of tuberculosis. A critical component in the computer-aided diagnosis of digital CXRs is the automatic detection of the lung regions. In this paper, we present a nonrigid registration-driven robust lung segmentation method using image retrieval-based patient specific adaptive lung models that detects lung boundaries, surpassing state-of-the-art performance. The method consists of three main stages: 1) a content-based image retrieval approach for identifying training images (with masks) most similar to the patient CXR using a partial Radon transform and Bhattacharyya shape similarity measure, 2) creating the initial patient-specific anatomical model of lung shape using SIFT-flow for deformable registration of training masks to the patient CXR, and 3) extracting refined lung boundaries using a graph cuts optimization approach with a customized energy function. Our average accuracy of 95.4% on the public JSRT database is the highest among published results. A similar degree of accuracy of 94.1% and 91.7% on two new CXR datasets from Montgomery County, MD, USA, and India, respectively, demonstrates the robustness of our lung segmentation approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据