4.7 Article

Automatic Detection of Optic Disc Based on PCA and Mathematical Morphology

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 786-796

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2013.2238244

关键词

Generalized distance function; geodesic transformation; optic disc; principal component analysis; watershed transformation

资金

  1. project Consolider-C CIBER of Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition, an initiative of ISCIII (Generalitat Valenciana. Conselleria de Educacion) [SEJ2006-14301/PSIC]
  2. project Excellence Research Program PROMETEO (Generalitat Valenciana. Conselleria de Educacion) [2008-157]
  3. [IMIDTA/2010/47]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The algorithm proposed in this paper allows to automatically segment the optic disc from a fundus image. The goal is to facilitate the early detection of certain pathologies and to fully automate the process so as to avoid specialist intervention. The method proposed for the extraction of the optic disc contour is mainly based on mathematical morphology along with principal component analysis (PCA). It makes use of different operations such as generalized distance function (GDF), a variant of the watershed transformation, the stochastic watershed, and geodesic transformations. The input of the segmentation method is obtained through PCA. The purpose of using PCA is to achieve the grey-scale image that better represents the original RGB image. The implemented algorithm has been validated on five public databases obtaining promising results. The average values obtained (a Jaccard's and Dice's coefficients of 0.8200 and 0.8932, respectively, an accuracy of 0.9947, and a true positive and false positive fractions of 0.9275 and 0.0036) demonstrate that this method is a robust tool for the automatic segmentation of the optic disc. Moreover, it is fairly reliable since it works properly on databases with a large degree of variability and improves the results of other state-of-the-art methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据