4.7 Article

Efficient Framework for Model-Based Tomographic Image Reconstruction Using Wavelet Packets

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
卷 31, 期 7, 页码 1346-1357

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2012.2187917

关键词

Dimensionality reduction; image enhancement/restoration (noise and artifact reduction); image reconstruction-iterative methods; integration of multiscale information; inverse methods; optoacoustic/photoacoustic imaging; X-ray imaging and computed tomography

资金

  1. European Community [235689]
  2. European Research Council
  3. German Research Foundation (DFG) [RA 1848/1]
  4. European Research Council Starting Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of model-based algorithms in tomographic imaging offers many advantages over analytical inversion methods. However, the relatively high computational complexity of model-based approaches often restricts their efficient implementation. In practice, many modern imaging modalities, such as computed-tomography, positron-emission tomography, or optoacoustic tomography, normally use a very large number of pixels/voxels for image reconstruction. Consequently, the size of the forward-model matrix hinders the use of many inversion algorithms. In this paper, we present a new framework for model-based tomographic reconstructions, which is based on a wavelet-packet representation of the imaged object and the acquired projection data. The frequency localization property of the wavelet-packet base leads to an approximately separable model matrix, for which reconstruction at each spatial frequency band is independent and requires only a fraction of the projection data. Thus, the large model matrix is effectively separated into a set of smaller matrices, facilitating the use of inversion schemes whose complexity is highly nonlinear with respect to matrix size. The performance of the new methodology is demonstrated for the case of 2-D optoacoustic tomography for both numerically generated and experimental data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据