4.7 Article

Sparse Brain Network Recovery Under Compressed Sensing

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 1154-1165

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2011.2140380

关键词

Brain connectivity; compressed sensing (CS); least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO); partial correlation

资金

  1. MEST [R31-2008-000-10103-0]
  2. NRF
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology [M103KV010016-08K2201-01610]
  4. Government of Korea
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [R31-2011-000-10089-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Partial correlation is a useful connectivity measure for brain networks, especially, when it is needed to remove the confounding effects in highly correlated networks. Since it is difficult to estimate the exact partial correlation under the small-n large-situation, a sparseness constraint is generally introduced. In this paper, we consider the sparse linear regression model with a l(1)-norm penalty, also known as the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), for estimating sparse brain connectivity. LASSO is a well-known decoding algorithm in the compressed sensing (CS). The CS theory states that LASSO can reconstruct the exact sparse signal even from a small set of noisy measurements. We briefly show that the penalized linear regression for partial correlation estimation is related to CS. It opens a new possibility that the proposed framework can be used for a sparse brain network recovery. As an illustration, we construct sparse brain networks of 97 regions of interest (ROIs) obtained from FDG-PET imaging data for the autism spectrum disorder (ASD) children and the pediatric control (PedCon) subjects. As validation, we check the network reproducibilities by leave-one-out cross validation and compare the clustered structures derived from the brain networks of ASD and PedCon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据