4.6 Article

Synthesis and characterization of nanostructured ternary zinc manganese oxide as novel supercapacitor material

期刊

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 721-727

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.11.032

关键词

Nano structures; Oxides; Heat treatment; Electrochemical properties

资金

  1. Science & Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science & Technology (DST), Govt. of India [SR/FTP/PS-137/2011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanostructured ZnMn2O4 is prepared by easy and cost effective urea combustion method, and characterized by X-ray diffraction, field-emission scanning electron microscope, transmission electron microscope and surface area analyzer. The prepared ZnMn2O4 (ZMO) is found to be crystalline and mesoporous in nature with homogenously distributed pores. The supercapacitive properties of the synthesized materials are studied using cyclic voltammetry, galvanostatic charge discharge cycling and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in 2 M KOH solution employing three-electrode system. The FESEM analysis reveals nearly spherical morphology of ZMO which is found to be beneficial for improved supercapacitive performance. Cyclic voltammetry shows unsymmetrical charge discharge curves with the capacitance value of 160 (+/- 5) Fg(-1). The galvanostatic charge discharge cycles exhibit good electrochemical stability of ZMO. The coulombic efficiency of ZMO is found to be almost 100% till 500 charge discharge cycles. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy studies confirm the structural stability and further complement the findings of cyclic voltammetry and galvanostatic cycling. The improved supercapacitive behavior of nano ZMO is ascribed to the unique morphology that consists of interlinked almost spherical nano particles. This interlinked assembly of ZMO nano particles with porous structure (homogeneous pores 10-30 nm) probably facilitates the ion kinetics at electrode-electrolyte interface. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据