4.7 Article

Robust Perceptual Image Hashing Based on Ring Partition and NMF

期刊

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TKDE.2013.45

关键词

Image hashing; multimedia security; nonnegative matrix factorization; ring partition

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) under large grant [DP0985456]
  2. China 863 Program [2012AA011005]
  3. China 973 Program [2013CB329404]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of China [61300109, 61363034, 61165009, 60963008, 61170131]
  5. Guangxi Bagui Scholar Teams for Innovation and Research
  6. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation [2012GXNSFGA060004, 2012GXNSFBA053166, 2011GXNSFD018026]
  7. Training Project for Excellent Middle-aged/Young Teachers in Guangxi Higher Education Institutions
  8. Scientific Research and Technological Development Program of Guangxi [10123005-8]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper designs an efficient image hashing with a ring partition and a nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF), which has both the rotation robustness and good discriminative capability. The key contribution is a novel construction of rotation-invariant secondary image, which is used for the first time in image hashing and helps to make image hash resistant to rotation. In addition, NMF coefficients are approximately linearly changed by content-preserving manipulations, so as to measure hash similarity with correlation coefficient. We conduct experiments for illustrating the efficiency with 346 images. Our experiments show that the proposed hashing is robust against content-preserving operations, such as image rotation, JPEG compression, watermark embedding, Gaussian low-pass filtering, gamma correction, brightness adjustment, contrast adjustment, and image scaling. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve comparisons are also conducted with the state-of-the-art algorithms, and demonstrate that the proposed hashing is much better than all these algorithms in classification performances with respect to robustness and discrimination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据