4.7 Article

High-Precision Time-of-Flight Determination Algorithm for Ultrasonic Flow Measurement

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2018.2869263

关键词

Cross correlation; flowmeter; fluid flow measurement; time-of-flight (TOF); ultrasonic

资金

  1. MINECO (Spanish Government) [ESP2015-72277-EXP]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Commercial time-of-flight (TOF) ultrasonic flowmeters (UFM) are rapidly expanding in the general industry. Among the different techniques that can be applied to determine the TOF of ultrasonic waves, the cross-correlation method presents numerous advantages, such as robustness for weak signals and noise suppression. However, the selection of an appropriate reference wave is presumably a key element in the precise measurement of TOF. In this paper, an algorithm to compute an accurate TOF is proposed. The form of the electric signal received by the transducer is obtained from an acoustically forced underdamped oscillator model, and the analytical solution of the model is proposed as a reference wave. In order to validate the effectiveness of this procedure, a UFM system is designed and tested in a flowmeter calibration test rig. It is demonstrated that the use of the presented scheme overcomes the average method limitations, and turns out to be a convenient solution in a wide range of conditions. Robust measurements of near-zero flow values are acquired, which allow the achievement of a high dynamic range. The error curve of the proposed system have been obtained, revealing that the absolute value of the relative errors is lower than 2% within all the spectrum of flow rates considered (from 0.2 to 150 m(3)/h). Results demonstrate that the algorithm provides high-precision measurements within a wide dynamic range. The algorithm is portable and versatile: it can be adapted to different types of transducers without the need of additional measurements, allowing adjusting parameters on-thefly for an optimal performance of the ultrasonic flowmeter (UFM) system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据