4.7 Article

Identification of Listeria Species Using a Low-Cost Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering System With Wavelet-Based Signal Processing

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2009.2019317

关键词

Biomedical signal processing; feature extraction; Listeria; pattern classification; Raman spectroscopy; surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS); wavelet transforms

资金

  1. Canadian Food Inspection Agency
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  4. Ontario Innovation Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the ability to distinguish between six species within the Listeria genus (including the human pathogen Listeria monocytogenes) based on a bacteria sample's surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) spectrum. Our measurement system consists of a portable low-cost Raman spectral acquisition unit and associated signal processing and classification modules. First, Listeria was cultured and then adsorbed onto silver colloidal nanoparticles for SERS measurements. A total of 483 SERS spectra were collected and preprocessed (using a stationary wavelet transform decomposition) to remove noise and baseline artifact. Distinguishing features were extracted by retaining detail wavelet coefficients of significant value across multiple scales. Using a linear classifier in association with leave one out cross-validation, the system achieved maximum classification accuracies of 96.1% (six-category) and 97.9% (two-category, L. monocytogenes versus all others). Dimensionality reduction was used to decrease the number of features from 74 to 5 while maintaining similar classification accuracy. In the future, it is envisioned that a measurement system such as this, which is a combination of low-cost hardware with sophisticated signal processing, could play a complementary role with existing methods in realizing a rapid inexpensive means of identifying food-borne bacterial pathogens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据