4.7 Article

Development and evaluation of a seismic monitoring system for building interiors - Part I: Experiment design and results

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2007.908638

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The advent of high-speed, lightweight, and durable sensor technologies opens new possibilities for field monitoring applications. In particular, under natural or man-made loading conditions, applying these new technologies to the monitoring of building interiors may substantially help rescue and reconnaissance crews during postevent evaluations. To test such a methodology, in this paper, we develop a specialized network of conventional analog and digital (camera) sensors and use them in monitoring nonstructural components subjected to vibration loading within a demonstration building structure. A full-scale vibration experiment is conducted with a research team from the University of California, Los Angeles, on a vacant structure damaged during the 1994 Northridge Earthquake. The building of interest is a four-story office building located in Sherman Oaks, CA. The investigation has two primary objectives: 1) to characterize the seismic response of an important class of equipment and building contents and 2) to study the applicability of tracking the response of these equipment and contents using arrays of image-based monitoring systems. In this paper, we describe the experimental field setup, including the analog and camera sensor systems and the networking hardware used to collect data, present the testing matrix, and sample the processed analog data results. We summarize the difficulties encountered in the field implementation of these types of monitoring systems while highlighting their potential benefits. In a companion paper, we present the analysis methodology applied to the image sequences collected and summarize needs for future work if such systems are to be robustly employed in the field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据