4.5 Article

Quickest Search Over Multiple Sequences

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION THEORY
卷 57, 期 8, 页码 5375-5386

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2011.2159038

关键词

Bayesian; CUSUM; optimal stopping; quickest search; sequential analysis

资金

  1. Qatar National Research Fund [NPRP-08-522-2-211]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The problem of sequentially finding an independent and identically distributed sequence that is drawn from a probability distribution Q(1) by searching over multiple sequences, some of which are drawn from Q(1) and the others of which are drawn from a different distribution Q(0), is considered. In the problem considered, the number of sequences with distribution Q(1) is assumed to be a random variable whose value is unknown. Within a Bayesian formulation, a sequential decision rule is derived that optimizes a trade-off between the probability of false alarm and the number of samples needed for the decision. In the case in which one can observe one sequence at a time, it is shown that the cumulative sum (CUSUM) test, which is well-known to be optimal for a non-Bayesian statistical change-point detection formulation, is optimal for the problem under study. Specifically, the CUSUM test is run on the first sequence. If a reset event occurs in the CUSUM test, then the sequence under examination is abandoned and the rule switches to the next sequence. If the CUSUM test stops, then the rule declares that the sequence under examination when the test stops is generated by Q(1). The result is derived by assuming that there are infinitely many sequences so that a sequence that has been examined once is not retested. If there are finitely many sequences, the result is also valid under a memorylessness condition. Expressions for the performance of the optimal sequential decision rule are also developed. The general case in which multiple sequences can be examined simultaneously is considered. The optimal solution for this general scenario is derived.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据