4.7 Article

Jamming-Resistant Collaborative Broadcast Using Uncoordinated Frequency Hopping

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIFS.2011.2165948

关键词

Antijamming communication; collaborative broadcast; frequency hopping; wireless networks

资金

  1. NSFC [61001072]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China [2010J01347]
  3. IBM OCR
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2011121050]
  5. SRF for ROCS, SEM
  6. Tsinghua-Qualcomm Joint Research Center
  7. U.S. National Science Foundation [CNS-1016260]
  8. U.S. Army Research Office [W911NF-08-1-0105]
  9. Division Of Computer and Network Systems
  10. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [1016260] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a jamming-resistant collaborative broadcast scheme for wireless networks, which utilizes the Uncoordinated Frequency Hopping (UFH) technique to counteract jamming without preshared keys, and exploits node cooperation to achieve higher communication efficiency and stronger jamming resistance. In this scheme, nodes that already obtain the broadcast message serve as relays to help forward it to other nodes. Relying on the sheer number of relay nodes, our scheme provides a new angle for jamming countermeasure, which not only significantly enhances the performance of jamming-resistant broadcast, but can readily be combined with other existing or emerging antijamming approaches in various applications. We present the collaborative broadcast protocol, and analyze its successful packet reception rate and the corresponding cooperation gain for both synchronous and asynchronous relays for a snapshot scenario. We also investigate the full broadcast process based on a Markov chain model and derive a closed-form expression of the average broadcast delay. Simulation results in both single-hop and multihop networks indicate that our scheme is a promising antijamming technique in wireless networks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据