4.6 Article

Electromagnetic Performance of an 18-Slot/10-Pole Fractional-Slot Surface-Mounted Permanent-Magnet Machine

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS
卷 50, 期 6, 页码 3685-3696

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIA.2014.2316362

关键词

Average torque; slot/pole number combinations; surface-mounted permanent-magnet (SPM) machine; torque ripple; unbalanced magnetic force (UMF); winding topologies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the electromagnetic performance of an 18-slot/10-pole fractional-slot surface-mounted permanent-magnet (SPM) machine and compares its performance with conventional fractional-slot 9-slot/10-pole, 12-slot/10-pole, and integer-slot 30-slot/10-pole SPM machines by 2-D finite-element (FE) analysis (FEA). The winding factors of the 18-slot/10-pole machine are first analyzed, and then its back electromagnetic force, average torque, cogging torque, and torque ripple are investigated. In addition, the influence of stator current excitation on the average torque and torque ripple, the impact of end windings on the average torque, the flux-weakening capability, the fault-tolerant capability, the magnet loss, and the mutual coupling between phases are also studied by 2-D FEA. The results show that the torque ripple can be suppressed in the 18-slot/10-pole SPM machine, whereas the average torque can be improved compared with the 12-slot/10-pole SPM machine. The unbalanced magnetic force in the 9-slot/10-pole SPM machine can be eliminated. Although the flux-weakening and fault-tolerant capabilities are reduced compared with the conventional 9-slot/10-pole and 12-slot/10-pole machine, the mutual coupling between phases can be eliminated. The magnet loss is slightly higher than that of a 30-slot/10-pole machine but significantly lower than those in both 9-slot/10-pole and 12-slot/10-pole machines. Finally, the experimental results are given for validation of theoretical analyses and FE results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据