4.8 Article

Brain Network Analysis of Compressive Sensed High-Density EEG Signals in AD and MCI Subjects

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 527-536

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2018.2868431

关键词

Alzheimer's disease (AD); brain connectivity; compressive sensing (CS); decision support; healthcare signal processing; high-density EEG (HD-EEG); mild cognitive impairment; permutation disalignment index

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health [GR-2011-02351397]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that causes a loss of connections between neurons. The goal of this paper is to construct a complex network model of the brain-electrical activity, using high-density EEG (HD-EEG) recordings, and to compare the network organization in AD, mild cognitive impaired (MCI), and healthy control (CNT) subjects. The HD-EEG of 16 AD, 16 MCI, and 12 CNT was recorded during an eye-closed resting state. The permutation disalignment index (PDI) was used to describe the dissimilarity between EEG signals and to construct the connection matrices of the network model. The three groups were found to have significantly different (p < 0.001) characteristic path length (lambda), average clustering coefficient (CC), and the global efficiency (GE). This is the first time that HD-EEG signals of AD, MCI, and CNT have been compared and that PDI has been used to discriminate between the three groups. Considering the large amount of data originating from HD-EEG acquisition, compared to standard EEG, the aim of this paper is also to assess that compression did not alter the results of the complex network analysis. Compressive sensing was adopted to compress and reconstruct the HD-EEG signals with minimal information loss, achieving an average structural similarity index of 0.954 (AD), 0.957 (MCI), and 0.959 (CNT). When applied to the reconstructed HD-EEG, complex network analysis provided a substantially unaltered performance, compared to the analysis of the original signals: lambda, CC, and GE of the three groups were indeed still significantly different (p < 0.001).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据