4.8 Article

Flame Image-Based Burning State Recognition for Sintering Process of Rotary Kiln Using Heterogeneous Features and Fuzzy Integral

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2012.2189224

关键词

Burning state recognition; heterogeneous features; neural networks (NNs) classifiers; ensemble models; fuzzy integral

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB320601]
  2. Plan for University Subject Innovation and Introducing Intelligence [B08015]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [61020106003]
  4. matching grant for 1000 Talent Program [201100020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate and robust recognition of burning state for sintering process of rotary kiln plays an important role in the design of image-based intelligent control systems. Existing approaches such as consensus-based methods, temperature-based methods and image segmentation-based methods could not achieve satisfactory performance. This paper presents a flame image-based burning state recognition system using a set of heterogeneous features and fusion techniques. These features, i.e., the color feature, the global and local configuration features, are able to characterize different aspects of flame images, and they can be extracted from pixel values directly without segmentation efforts. In this study, ensemble learner models with four types of base classifiers and five fusion operators are examined with comprehensive comparisons. A total of 482 typical flame images, including 86 over-burning state images, 193 under-burning state images, and 203 normal-burning state images, were used in our experiments. These images were collected from the No. 3 rotary kiln at the Shanxi Aluminum Corporation in China, and labeled by the rotary kiln operational experts. Results demonstrate that our proposed image-based burning state recognition systems outperform other methods in terms of both recognition accuracy and robustness against the disturbance from smoke and dust inside the kiln.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据